But since then, it appeared that the state and the company were heading towards the end of their litigation and signalled in February that an agreement was imminent. Nine months after a New York government agency ordered Charter to leave the state because of an alleged breach of the terms of the merger, state officials announced an agreement that will keep Charter in New York in exchange for a new broadband extension. The comparison will impose a new version of the initial terms of the merger and will require a payment of $12 million, about half of which could help other ISPs deploy broadband. The extension is expected to be completed by September 30, 2021. The agreement also includes $12 million of the Charter for the deployment of broadband to 45,000 other upstate addresses. “Charter and the department believe this is an important step forward in making very high-speed broadband available to all New Yorkers,” said Stamford, Conn. resident companies in a statement. The Commission granted these two extensions on Friday. However, it has given both parties until 17 April to submit a final transaction agreement to the Commission. It stated that any agreement would be made public for comment before the Commission responded.
A few words in an important legal document should be one of the priorities of a dispute between the cable company and government regulators. But the agreement is expected to end the dispute between the parties over what really matters to the 145,000 sites. While Charter claimed to meet all deadlines for the terms of the merger, PSC Charter accused charter of counting sites that were not eligible for the provision obligation. For example, the CSP asserted that Charter had wrongly counted the deployment of broadband in New York homes and businesses, which it already had to implement as part of its franchise agreements. How will executives be able to justify any amount of the cost of the board if the company can simply continue to cash in without compensation, except in the form of pink oaths? In addition to meeting its expansion obligations, Charter must also provide $12 million for “additional broadband deployment projects at sites selected by the Department of Public Service and the New York State Broadband Program Office.” This money is halved, with $6 million paid to the New York State Broadband Program Office and $6 million to a charter trust fund to do the work on state orders. Let`s be clear: the deployment of broadband was unfortunate, so the state paid a lot of money to the incumbent for promising to fix it. This money was cashed without consideration, so the state now pays more money to the holder to promise to repair it and removes the threat of penalties for misappropriation of taxpayers` money. Details of the agreement under discussion have not been released.